ETFs

Vanguard’s MGK vs. iShares’ IWO

  • MGK carries a much lower expense ratio and holds far fewer stocks than IWO.

  • MGK delivered a much stronger five-year return and shallower drawdown, but its portfolio is heavily tilted toward technology giants.

  • IWO’s small-cap focus brings higher volatility and broader sector exposure compared to MGK’s concentrated mega-cap lineup.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:IWO) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:MGK) differ sharply on cost, portfolio concentration, and sector tilt, with MGK offering a more affordable route to mega-cap tech exposure, and IWO targeting small-cap growth across a wider set of industries.

Both funds aim to capture U.S. growth stocks, but IWO zeroes in on small-cap companies, while MGK targets the largest growth names in the market. This match-up pits diversification and volatility against concentration and efficiency, making the choice highly dependent on what kind of growth exposure may appeal to an investor’s strategy.

Metric

IWO

MGK

Issuer

IShares

Vanguard

Expense ratio

0.24%

0.07%

1-yr return (as of 2025-12-18)

12.2%

18.0%

Dividend yield

0.65%

0.37%

Beta

1.40

1.20

AUM

$13.23 billion

$32.68 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

MGK is more affordable than IWO on fees, with an expense ratio that is 0.17 percentage points lower. IWO also pays a slightly higher dividend yield, but both ETFs offer very modest payouts.

Metric

IWO

MGK

Max drawdown (5 y)

-42.02%

-36.01%

Growth of $1,000 over 5 years

$1,128

$2,019

MGK focuses tightly on just 69 mega-cap stocks, with a striking 71% allocation to technology and its top three holdings — Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) — collectively making up over a third of the fund. This concentrated approach has delivered robust historical returns, but the portfolio is dominated by the very largest U.S. growth companies. The fund has an 18-year track record and no unusual structural quirks.

IWO, by contrast, spreads its bets across more than 1,000 small-cap growth stocks, with sector weights of 25% technology, 22% healthcare, and 21% industrials. Its top holdings — Credo Technology Group Holding (NASDAQ:CRDO), Bloom Energy Class A (NYSE:BE), and Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) — each account for just over 1% of assets, reflecting a far less concentrated approach. This broader exposure brings higher volatility but may appeal to those seeking diversification beyond mega-cap tech.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button