VNQI Offers Broad International Real Estate at Low Cost. RWX Takes a Narrower, Pricier Path.
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI +0.38%) provides a low-cost, broadly diversified entry into international property markets, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX +0.39%) offers a more concentrated alternative with higher cash positions.
International real estate can serve as a potent diversifier, offering exposure to economic cycles and rental markets outside the U.S. These two ETFs aim to capture that potential, but they take different paths toward the same goal. Investors may weigh the massive liquidity and low fees of the Vanguard fund against the specific strategy and smaller footprint of the SPDR fund.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | VNQI | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Vanguard | SPDR |
| Expense ratio | 0.12% | 0.59% |
| 1-yr return (as of May. 7, 2026) | 14.10% | 9.90% |
| Dividend yield | 4.50% | 3.60% |
| Beta | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| AUM | $3.7 billion | $276.9 million |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
Operating costs and yields play a pivotal role in the long-term success of international real estate strategies. The Vanguard fund stands out as a highly efficient option, featuring an expense ratio that is 0.47 percentage points lower than the SPDR trust. This cost advantage allows more of the underlying property income to reach investors. Furthermore, the Vanguard fund has historically provided a stronger income stream, with a trailing-12-month dividend yield of 4.50% compared to 3.60% for the SPDR fund.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | VNQI | RWX |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (35.80%) | (35.90%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $999 | $938 |
SPDR Index Shares Funds – State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF
Today’s Change
(0.39%) $0.11
Current Price
$28.25
Key Data Points
Day’s Range
$28.19 – $28.45
52wk Range
$25.69 – $30.47
Volume
15K
What’s inside
The State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF follows a strategy that concentrates on a smaller group of high-conviction assets. Launched in 2006, the fund manages 121 holdings. Its largest positions include Mitsui Fudosan at 6.52%, Swiss Prime Site at 2.98%, and Scentre Group at 2.80%. Over the trailing 12 months, the fund has paid $1.02 per share in dividends.
In contrast, the Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF offers much more granular diversification across the global property landscape. Launched in 2010, the fund holds 682 positions, providing exposure to a broader range of small and mid-sized international property companies. Its top holdings include Goodman Group at 3.36%, Mitsubishi Estate at 3.09%, and Mitsui Fudosan at 2.71%. The Vanguard fund has paid $2.16 per share over the trailing 12 months.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Vanguard International Equity Index Funds – Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
Today’s Change
(0.38%) $0.18
Current Price
$47.72
Key Data Points
Day’s Range
$47.60 – $47.87
52wk Range
$42.63 – $50.88
Volume
59
What this means for investors
International real estate means names most U.S. investors won’t recognize. Mitsui Fudosan and Mitsubishi Estate are Japan’s largest diversified property developers. Goodman Group is an Australian logistics giant powering warehouses and data centers across Asia-Pacific. Segro is a U.K. industrial and logistics REIT. These companies anchor both VNQI and RWX, so owning either fund means trusting property cycles, currencies, and interest rate environments far removed from the U.S. market.
The funds take different approaches to that universe. VNQI spreads exposure across nearly 700 holdings, keeping concentration low and diversification broad. RWX holds roughly 120 companies, with its top position alone accounting for about 7% of the fund, and maintains a notable cash allocation that reduces pure real estate exposure.
The cost difference is the most compelling argument for VNQI. RWX charges nearly five times as much, a gap that compounds meaningfully over time and demands significantly stronger performance to justify. For most long-term investors seeking international real estate diversification, VNQI’s broader portfolio and dramatically lower fee make it the more sensible choice.
